Assange: mobilization against extraditions in view of the appeal


LONDON, 25 OCT – The mobilization of activists committed to human rights and freedom of the press has resumed in the United Kingdom on the eve of the British appeals process intended to decide on the appeal presented by the Washington justice to obtain extradition to the States United by Julian Assange, co-founder of Wikileaks, after the first instance sentence that denied it last January. Over the weekend, several hundred people paraded through the streets of London – from the BBC headquarters to the High Court, where the two days of crucial hearings on the fate of the Australian activist, relentlessly pursued by the US since Wikileaks will begin on Wednesday. released a mountain of embarrassing American documents, including on war crimes committed in Afghanistan and Iraq. Assange is accused in the US of violating the Espionage Act, a highly contested charge by human rights defenders and never raised before for a case of journalistic publication of secret files, as well as complicity in computer piracy. Overseas the author of Wikileaks, who for over two years has been detained in the London maximum security prison of Belmarsh despite no longer having any pending with the justice of the Kingdom, after the 7 years spent as a refugee in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, risks a monstrous sentence of 175 years in prison. Sentence that according to an expert opinion accepted by the British first instance judge would expose him to the risk of suicide. Assange’s legal team has always rejected the accusations, deemed a threat to press freedom and the result of political revenge. All the more so according to the latest revelations that emerged in September according to which the CIA, during the Trump administration, in 2017, had studied a plan to kidnap and possibly assassinate Assange during his stay in the Ecuadorian diplomatic headquarters. In January a London court denied extradition to protect her “mental health”. In the summer, however, the US managed to question the reliability of the appraisal received at first instance, obtaining the go-ahead for the appeal. (HANDLE).
(HANDLE)




Source link

Leave a Comment